Panasonic PV-DV203

Panasonic PV-DV203

User reviews
4.7

Battery Life

4.7

Ease of Use

4.7

Features

write a review

Panasonic PV-DV203

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

Panasonic PV-DV203
3.71 7 user reviews
557%
40%
314%
214%
10%
014%
4.7

Battery Life

4.7

Ease of Use

4.7

Features

4.5

Sound Quality

4

Value For Money

4

Video Quality

User Reviews

Longja
2

Video Quality

I Bought The Pv-dv203-k Camera Years Ago And Only

I bought the pv-dv203-k camera years ago and only got to use it for maybe two years.Something happened to the eye piece and the view finder, could barely see anything through them became very dark to look through. it also recorded dark as well. Will play back old tapes recorded earlier with camera worked well. Won't make the mistake of spending good money on a panasonic again, kind of disapointing

Guest
5

Features

5

Ease of Use

5

Value For Money

4

Video Quality

4

Sound Quality

5

Battery Life

I Have Had The Sony Dv 203d Camera About Five Year

I have had the Sony DV 203D Camera about five years. It still performs great without any problems. Picture is very good even on our 32 inch HD TV.

I will definitely choose Sony for my next digital photo product. My 2001 Mavica digital still camera is still gets lots of use an is working great!

itshimthere
5

Features

5

Ease of Use

5

Value For Money

5

Video Quality

5

Sound Quality

5

Battery Life

I Bought The Panasonic Pv-dv203 Camera Knowing It

I bought the Panasonic PV-DV203 camera knowing it was very good and it turned out brilliant. Now I own a business that films all types of things and I'm very proud with it. Plus there are no bad points about the camera. Plus I started of as a first time user and turned pro because of this camera.

rln
4

Features

4

Ease of Use

1

Value For Money

5

Video Quality

4

Sound Quality

4

Battery Life

I Bought This Panasonic Pvdv203 Digital Camera Las

I bought this Panasonic PVDV203 digital camera last november. I was impressed by the video quality until I ran into the Dew Detected error. As soon as I turn the camera on, the lcd displays a warning that dew has been detected and then says eject tape. even though there is no tape inside. I contacted Panasonic and they recommended leaving the camera open for some time and if the problem still exists they recommeded shipping it to their service center in IL. They said they will charge $140 for looking at the issue.... I am very disappointed by the quality of the camera. Please avoid buying it.

walon2
5

Value For Money

Since I Have Buaght This Panasonic Pvdv203 Digital

Since i have buaght this Panasonic PVDV203 digital camera i have used it many times. the video quality is spectacular and i enjoy shooting filfs with it. if you are looking to buy a first time camera i highly recomend you buy the panasonic pv-dv203. for the low price, you cant go wrong!

mlsw1.
5

Value For Money

Great Toy. To The Point You Connect It To Your Pc

Great toy. To the point you connect it to your PC and use their "View Manager" etc software. Good luck figuring out how to convert your shot to a jpeg. You'll face lots of surprises starting with look and feel of their software design...

Anyway, the camcorder is co-o-o-l! Software sucks.

Geoff.
3

Value For Money

As An Experienced Digital Camcorder And Camera Own

As an experienced digital camcorder and camera owner, I have been on the move again. I was recently trying to decide which digital camcorder to keep. Decisions, decisions. Immediately after buying the Panasonic PVDV203, I tried out the new Sony TRV19. I found that it had some nice Sony features, especially the Carl Zeiss lens and touch screen LCD. I wish it had at least megapixel still image quality or at least some type of interpolation. I then returned to the Panasonic DV203 and have grown to like it a lot. It offers nice features for the price and the overall quality is fairly decent.

The Panasonic PVDV203 that I originally, only briefly tried out is looking better and better for the money.

Admittedly, the Panasonic PV-DV203 has some disadvantages and might not be the "heavy duty serious" type of camcorder that critical cameraphiles look for, but it has some nice features for the price. The non-glare LED style light is a plus and it offers SD media storage for $599. There is a the "magic pix" setting for enhanced exposure. Audio, a hallmark of Panasonic not always mentioned in camcorder discussions, is superb.

Unfortunately, the low light capability of the Panasonic PV-DV203 is mediocre in a dark or dimly lit room but quality seems to improve significantly using the LED light and/or Magic Pix feature. I still need to use this camcorder under a lot of different conditions to get a much better idea as to its capabilities. Initial reaction is that Sony optics in particular are definitely superior. Whether that justified the price difference is another matter and a very subjective decision. I will be doing a lot of outdoor shooting shortly, but of course that is optimal for most digital cameras and camcorders.

One of the major disadvantages is mainly the "interpolation" instead of "real" megapixel still imaging. You can definitely see the difference.

A web designer I work with who is very experienced with digital photography pointed out to me that low light video is usually not that great with many camcorders and that the low or zero lux features available on some are a nice and important feature only if you happen to shoot in very dark or non-lit areas. After examining and handling it, he also noted that the Panasonic DV203 has some nice features and that suggested that I should use it extensively rather than prejudging it by constantly looking for slight advantages or disadvantages. It does offer a lot of functionality and I guess I am not going to find the "perfect" digital camcorder in this price range. The bottom line is that I need to get used to it, enjoy it and explore its versatility, which is significant. It would also be nice, however, if there were more published reviews on this product but I can't find any - so far. I guess because the product is so new. I am now leaning toward keeping this camcorder. By the way, if you look up this camcorder on the Circuit City web site, you'll see my admittedly :-) non-professional mini-review of it. There currently only two on the site for the 203 as of this writing. It is also available online at a lower price than the MSRP.

3
mlsw1.

Useful

mlsw1.

You flounder. Do you have an opinion?

And if we should take your buddy's advice then let your buddy write the review and don't waste our time.

FABIO FORERO.

the quality image is bad in low light, qualification is 2

1 - 7 of 7 items displayed
1

Q&A

There are no questions yet.