
Canon PowerShot S2 IS
Battery Life
Ease of Use
Features
Canon PowerShot S2 IS
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

User Reviews
Value For Money
I Have Used This Model From 2005-2009 And I Love T
I have used this model from 2005-2009 and i love this family series. My wildlife pictures came out great, easy to lug around and it was so practical for me. One cannot expect it to produce the sharpness like a SLR, because it ain't a SLR!
The only drawback is that this model is now consuming a lot of battery power as this camera gets older. Therefore, it was time for me to upgrade.
Because I had good experiences with this camera, I have now upgraded to Canon Powershot SX1 IS and is great!
I will miss my Canon Powershot S2 IS and hope this camera will serve well to its next new owner.
Value For Money
The Canon Powershot S2 Is Is Too Complicated, Acce
The Canon PowerShot S2 IS is too complicated, accessories are expensive, PC interface software never worked (even after following Canon's VERY specific, and once again, complicated instructions). Finally ended up having to use a card reader to recover images. It finally quit working (won't aquire images) altogether after being stored for 6 months. I had only put a total of about 30 hours on the beast, taking less than 500 images, over the 3 years I have owned it. The reason I chose this product was because I have 2 Canon printers and an old A20 Powershot that still work well.
Would Not Recommend It. Dont Buy It After Reading
Would not recommend it. Dont buy it after reading rave reviews of those who have used it for only a few weeks. I used it extensively for more than 2 years and it let me down. I'd never buy a Canon digital camera again.
Value For Money
I've Used My Canon Powershot S2 Is On Holiday In M
I've used my Canon Powershot S2 IS on holiday in Malaysia for the last month after swapping it for my newly bought Fuji s9500. It does almost all of what the Fuji does without the bulk, hence you can take it with you without feeling you're on a photo shoot. Best feature has to be the superb zoom ,fitted into a tiny space with a maximum aperture as wide as the Fuji's. Image stabilisation is a blessing and it works (within limits). The Fuji was really hard work at long focal lengths in anything but strong sunlight. Nice to hold, instant start up, minimal shutter lag but sometimes slow on focussing. Manual focussing is a bit cumbersome but can be achieved for the odd tricky shot. Brilliant macro mode. Once you're familiar with it, manual controls are surprisingly easy to use - I generally use the P (Program) mode in preference to auto, which sometimes seems to select an inappropriately low ISO in low light, leading to underexposure. Screen can be hard to see in sunlight but there's always the decent electronic viewfinder, which I found myself using by choice much of the time, I'm surprised to say - it seems more natural to do so.
Ease of Use
Value For Money
Battery Life
Image Quality
I Own A Sony Dsc-h1 And Won Some Money (not Much S
I own a Sony DSC-H1 and won some money (not much so don`t spam me - lol), so I decided to buy a Canon PowerShot S2 IS digital camera as I wanted a camera with a swivel screen. I was most disappointed it did not have a live histogram, which is very important now I come to not have it. The screen is terrible to see in bright light, and I have no problems at all with the Sony. I also had both cameras out one day and took some pictures of a huge overhead crane. All the glass surround had chromatic aberration taken with the Canon, but those taken with the Sony at the same time, had none whatsoever. Picture quality is equal, apart from that I would say.
I have the hood and extender so I can use filters, but because of the way it is designed it causes vignetting at wide angles, which is not so with the superb Sony design. I don`t know what Canon was thinking of in that respect, and I see they have done it again with the S3.
I would not recommend this camera over the Sony on those major and very important points. I am marking features overall at zero as I think the lack of live histogram deserves that, especially from Canon, and there is still no live histogram on the S3.
Hi Mike----I wrote this review some weeks back and as camera is not yet released I was only of course going by what was available on the review sites at the time. It seemed the reviewers were not able to decide whether or not it did or did not have a live histogram,as some said no,some said yes! Even Canon on their web-site must not know as it is not even mentioned there, or wasn`t 2 weeks ago. I do consider the live histogram VERY important as it actually shows the exposure on the sensor itself, the exposure reading in viewfinder does not show the exposure there. So hence it gives a very accurate rendering of exposure,especially when you can adjust the histogram as you are shooting, I always use manual mode so it is very essential to me I reckon. Now it seems by reading a Japanese web-site that it does have this feature,great stuff if it does. Also going from 5mp to 6mp without increasing size of sensor can of course cause image problems--IF NOT sorted out by Canons design team, and as they cannot design/redesign a decent lens cap,I have very little faith in that dept. So in fact image quality could be below that of S2 maybe!! not a risk worth taking until some full and proper reviews arrive. Camera was being shown as costing around £400 at time of my review but I see the competition has hotted up since then so can now be got for just over £300 and that is before its released--I DO NOT like the sound of that as it seems they may know something we humble customers do not yet know,ie. camera is crap so sell as many by pre-sales now before the public catch on. They are just like bookies and have to hedge their bets a bit. So if you want one I would certainly hang on for a while is my humble opinion. The only worthwhile improvement I can see is that it is black. I have taken lots of pictures with it now and will always maintain that the Sony DSC-H1 takes much better pics. and is better and easier to use. So hang about and get the new Sony DSC-H5 when it comes out,it promises to be a scorching good camera. It could well be cheaper too. Hope have helped you some.
dear pixiedot
you say 'The new S3 is a very poor and expensive upgrade methinks' i was going to go for one of those - why is it so bad?
Hi-Bertie--where is Swansea?? just kidding. No,I live in good old Durham, the frozen north at this moment in time--actually I do really like the swivel screen, now that, in the future will be very high on my priorities--Bristol Cameras do the s2 IS very cheap at the moment and are VERY reliable. The new S3 is a very poor and expensive upgrade methinks--cheers
If you're within reasonable travelling distance of Swansea pixiedot, I'll definitely be interested.
Sure do want to rid me of it, I honestly would not have considered the histogram very high on priority had I not been used to one for 6 months with my Sony DSC-H1 as all I use on that is manual mode with the live histogram--believe me it is a doddle to use that way and 100% spot on exposures all the time.Maybe zero was a tad unfair.I was going to stick it on Ebay,but since the S3 is kicking about(still no live histogram--cough cough) the price has dropped off a bit and I just coughed up for camera,hood and SD card.It takes great pics mind you but I just love my Sony--thanks-- make me an offer--1 week old!!! lol--I think I might get wrong for spamming now--I hope not.
Features
Ease of Use
Value For Money
Battery Life
Image Quality
I Have Been Taking Photographs For 50 Years And Ha
I have been taking photographs for 50 years and have owned dozens of small and large format cameras. When I think of all the extra gear that I used to carry around to achieve the type of results that the Canon PowerShot produces; one cannot ask for much more. I take a lot of pictures of animals and birds and find that the 2.4fps mode to be very useful. I have a 2gb card so the 776 shots at SL quality is a decent quantity.
If I am taking night shots at full zoom, I usually set the self timer to 1 second which does help. The results with the image stabilizer on are always sharp. I have used all the facilities on the camera in the one month of ownership and have found them all to be very good, especially the "Swap Colours" and "Colour Accent" modes.
A set of batteries will last for over 500 shots before recharging and being AA's is a bonus. I have taken over 5000 pictures in the one month of ownership and have not found any faults. "MY LENSCAP DOES NOT FALL OFF!" which appears to happen with some users. Looking forward to many more years of use with this camera.
Features
Ease of Use
Value For Money
Battery Life
Image Quality
This Is My First Digital Camera. I Bought It Becau
This is my first digital camera. I bought it because I needed a camera that powered off AA batteries and had a big zoom. With it I bought a 1Gb Sandisk Ultra II SD and 8 (2 sets) 2500mAH rechargeables. It is very satisfying to use and easy once you know your way round the standard digital camera controls.
Its rich feature set does mean that there are lots of options but for everyday operation the controls are readily at hand. I am very impressed with being able to use an equivalent 400mm+ zoom without tripod. On a 2 week holiday we took 170+ pics, a few minutes of video, some sound recordings and my son did lots of "playing" with it. One set of rechargeables lasted the 16 day duration with spare to review all the pics on the tv back home and there was plenty of space left in the memory. Downloading to the PC is quick and easy, taking only a couple of minutes for everything. I am using Windows XP, and I have not as yet installed any of the Canon supplied software.
There are similar cameras with a faster (and slower) response time but I found it fine, except when taking pictures of moving objects like car racing. The "half press" and some anticipation were a must and were made harder by the less than clear viewfinder. I also have fingerprints on the lense thanks to the annoying lense cap falling off.
Overall, I am absolutely thrilled with the camera and have no regrets for waiting for it to come onto market or its cost.
Have subsequently found the reason for the night shot problems with bright lights. The camera's night setting takes a long exposure (1 sec) combined with a the flash. The problems with the lights was due to camera movement, me being unaware of the very long exposure. There is another night setting which does not have a long exposure, so the camera has it all, just the operator that was lacking!
Features
Ease of Use
Value For Money
Battery Life
Image Quality
Canon Powershot S2 Is - Great Camera With Too Many
Canon PowerShot S2 IS - Great camera with too many features to list. Takes great photos in auto mode and can be used manually with fantastic results. High quality video and audio capture.
For a person like myself who has never owned a digital camera, this takes quite a bit of learning to use it proficiently. The lens is fantastic and zoom is great. I bought this camera to take shots of my kids playing sport and dancing performances. The healthy 12 times zoom performed magnificently and the optical image stabilization is fantastic.
I waited a long time for a special digital camera to come along, this Canon PowerShot S2 IS Digital Camera was worth the wait. Apart from the above mentioned bad points, this camera comes very highly recommended. There is nothing that it can't do well.
Q&A
There are no questions yet.